Neurodiversity Celebration Week, beyond awareness

Neurodiversity Celebration Week runs in March each year, and it has become one of the most widely marked moments in the workplace inclusion calendar. It is also, in our experience, the one where the gap between the event and the everyday experience is widest.

Organisations run a warm, well attended session in March. Neurodivergent staff are still waiting on an adjustment in July.

Awareness is not the bottleneck any more

Ten years ago, explaining what neurodivergence is would have been useful. Today most workplaces have a reasonable general awareness, and the barrier has moved. The problem is rarely that colleagues have never heard of ADHD. It is that the process for getting a screen reader, a quieter space or a different meeting format takes four months and three retellings of the same personal information.

So if you only have budget for one thing in March, spend it on fixing the process rather than raising the awareness.

Measure the thing that actually matters

Here is a question most organisations cannot answer: how long does an adjustment take, from first request to actually being in place?

Not the policy target. The real elapsed time, measured across the last ten requests. It is usually a revelation, and it is the single most useful number you can put in front of a leadership team, because it is specific, undeniable and fixable.

Stop making people re-explain themselves

A common pattern: someone gets an adjustment agreed, then their manager changes, and the whole conversation starts again. Then a reorganisation happens and it starts again. Each retelling costs that person something, and the cost is invisible to everyone else.

A passport style record that travels with the person, held by them and recognised across the organisation, removes most of this. It is a small administrative change with a large effect on people's daily experience.

Design for the general case, not the exception

Many adjustments that get treated as individual exceptions would help almost everyone if they were simply normal: agendas circulated in advance, meetings that do not rely on instant verbal processing, written follow-ups after verbal briefings, quiet space that anyone can use without asking.

Every time one of these becomes standard practice, that is one fewer thing someone has to disclose a diagnosis to obtain.

Recruitment screens people out before you meet them

A great deal of neurodivergent exclusion happens before anyone is employed. Interviews reward fast verbal processing, confident eye contact and the ability to improvise a structured answer under time pressure. Very little actual work requires that combination.

Small changes make a disproportionate difference: sending questions in advance, being explicit about the format and who will be there, allowing written responses where the role involves writing, and assessing against the job rather than against interview performance. These help almost every candidate, which is rather the point.

Disclosure is a calculation, not an oversight

People weigh up whether disclosing will get them support or get them labelled. If they have seen a colleague disclose and then be quietly passed over, the calculation resolves quickly.

You cannot fix that with encouragement. You fix it by making the support real and visible, so the calculation changes. If people can see that adjustments happen quickly and without fuss, disclosure stops being a gamble.

Waiting lists and the diagnosis problem

NHS waiting times for adult ADHD and autism assessment run to years in many areas. If your process requires a formal diagnosis before any adjustment is made, you have built a policy that excludes most of the people it was written for.

A better default is to respond to the need rather than the paperwork. If someone says noise makes it hard to concentrate, the question worth asking is what would help, not what have you been diagnosed with. Most useful adjustments cost little and require no medical evidence at all.

Six things that help, that cost almost nothing

Agendas and materials circulated in advance, as standard, for everyone.

Written follow-ups after verbal briefings, so nobody is relying on what they retained in the room.

Clear, literal instructions instead of implication and hint.

Meetings that do not require instant verbal responses, with space to come back afterwards.

Quiet space that anyone can use without asking permission or explaining why.

Predictable notice of change wherever it is possible to give it.

Every one of these that becomes normal practice is one fewer thing somebody has to disclose a diagnosis to obtain.

A note on celebration

Celebration has genuine value, and this is not an argument against it. Strengths-focused framing helps counter a long history of deficit language. But celebration on its own, in an organisation where adjustments take months, reads as hollow to the people it is aimed at. Do both, and if you can only do one, do the one that changes something.

See the training →